harshy post_id=29798 time= user_id=970 Wrote:This can’t be produced by sky surely looks like it’s a whisper production.
Sky
is the host broadcaster I believe.
Those are horrific, among the most garish sports graphics I’ve ever seen. Trying to think off hand of something more garish. Some of the luminous green stuff ESPN has done for Monday Night Football possibly.
(Fully prepared for it to be outdone though by the United Rugby Championship though if what we’ve seen so far of their house style translates over to match graphics).
Sky's Darts coverage is irritating me. Multiple stuck/dead pixels on at least two cameras that can't be unseen once you spot them.
Seems a bit odd - wonder if BT just lost out or deliberately scaling back. As said it seems wasted on Sky considering they have virtually all football slots covered across the weekend with PL, EFL or SPFL.
RhysJR post_id=29756 time= user_id=1340 Wrote:![[Image: TVLF%2032.jpg]](https://up.metropol247.co.uk/RhysJR/TVLF%2032.jpg)
it's Formula E meets Premier League (World Feed).
Apparently the branding is all down to the ECB.
Does BBC2 have any commitments after the Olympics - can't think of anything they would be showing live. Possible they may promote them - can't see what harm they do on BBC2 in the afternoon if there isn't a more prominent event being shown.
The Hundred ...
A few seconds of a Sky Sports feature (on Cockney rhyming slang) leaked into the BBC coverage in vision only a couple of minutes ago.
Some more The Hundred graphics.
Think they've added rather than removed data from the graphics, I don't think the name and score of the batter not on strike was there yesterday:
I vote for this graphic to be used far more often:
I vote for this graphic to be banished from exsistence (the two flash back and forth for five seconds or so):
![[Image: TVLF%2040.jpg]](https://up.metropol247.co.uk/RhysJR/TVLF%2040.jpg)
thegeek post_id=29872 time= user_id=1372 Wrote:Apparently the branding is all down to the ECB.
Watched the last few minutes tonight. Forget the colours for a moment - the more I think about it, the more it's as though whoever designed it doesn't actually watch cricket themselves - as I mentioned yesterday, your eyes are constantly having to roam from one side of the screen to the other to figure out what the score is; the full screen scorecard is "ok", though 4s and 6s would be a useful thing to show in this format, but the summary graphic (two large team logos and runs, balls and wickets below each in different rectangles)
is again, a lot more effort to read than it ought to be.
And of course the team names in the logos are impossible to read as well.
I'm intrigued if there will be pressure to make changes in the coming weeks, or it will have to wait until next year.
william post_id=30036 time= user_id=1264 Wrote:thegeek post_id=29872 time= user_id=1372 Wrote:Apparently the branding is all down to the ECB.
Watched the last few minutes tonight. Forget the colours for a moment - the more I think about it, the more it's as though whoever designed it doesn't actually watch cricket themselves - as I mentioned yesterday, your eyes are constantly having to roam from one side of the screen to the other to figure out what the score is; the full screen scorecard is "ok", though 4s and 6s would be a useful thing to show in this format, but the summary graphic (two large team logos and runs, balls and wickets below each in different rectangles)
is again, a lot more effort to read than it ought to be.
And of course the team names in the logos are impossible to read as well.
I'm intrigued if there will be pressure to make changes in the coming weeks, or it will have to wait until next year.
Apparently here to stay...
https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/141...1371730946
Do the balls count up or down?