At this point, "woke" just means "any opinion I don't like".
Inspector Sands post_id=27579 time= user_id=1003 Wrote:RegularCapital post_id=27565 time= user_id=995 Wrote:Ofcom licence update: GB News' licences have been transferred from All Perspectives Ltd. to GB News Ltd.
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/manage-your-lic...es/updates
Wonder what that's about. Looking at their Companies House entries GB News Ltd is wholey owned by All Perspectives what difference it makes I don't know. Some technicality about foreign ownership?
Maybe they're setting up a different limited company for GB News Radio, or something else.
Adsales101 post_id=27573 time= user_id=1759 Wrote:Well the latest BARB figures should worry GBN.
Less than half in weekly reach and total viewing when compared to launch week, which means the loss of viewers has further accelerated.
At the same time BBC News and Sky News have stayed where they’ve always been (+/- the normal fluctuations).
Do you have some figures?
James2001 post_id=27597 time= user_id=956 Wrote:At this point, "woke" just means "any opinion I don't like".
I don't like all the online hate for GB News - does that make me woke then?
Actually I think that's definitely one in the eye for anyone who said it was anti-woke. Not all right wingers are racists and to get back O/T, I'm glad GB News are doing some stuff to help smash the stereotype.
James Martin post_id=27600 time= user_id=872 Wrote:Adsales101 post_id=27573 time= user_id=1759 Wrote:Well the latest BARB figures should worry GBN.
Less than half in weekly reach and total viewing when compared to launch week, which means the loss of viewers has further accelerated.
At the same time BBC News and Sky News have stayed where they’ve always been (+/- the normal fluctuations).
Do you have some figures?
Sure.
Figures are 14-20 June, 21-27 June and 28 June - 4 July in that order.
Weekly reach (in million)
GBN 2.66 - 1.88 - 1.35
BBC 7.24 - 7.29 - 7.50
Sky 4.49 - 4.88 - 4.41
Viewing share (total)
GBN 0.62% - 0.49% - 0.30%
BBC 1.15% - 1.41% - 1.30%
Sky 0.67% - 0.75% - 0.68%
Google trends are looking even worse
https://trends.google.co.uk/trends/explo...=gb%20news
I mean it's not great but the novelty has now worn off. It's noticeable that this thread is much quieter now, and certainly the online hate has subsided.
Adsales101 post_id=27602 time= user_id=1759 Wrote:James Martin post_id=27600 time= user_id=872 Wrote:Adsales101 post_id=27573 time= user_id=1759 Wrote:Well the latest BARB figures should worry GBN.
Less than half in weekly reach and total viewing when compared to launch week, which means the loss of viewers has further accelerated.
At the same time BBC News and Sky News have stayed where they’ve always been (+/- the normal fluctuations).
Do you have some figures?
Sure.
Figures are 14-20 June, 21-27 June and 28 June - 4 July in that order.
Weekly reach (in million)
GBN 2.66 - 1.88 - 1.35
BBC 7.24 - 7.29 - 7.50
Sky 4.49 - 4.88 - 4.41
Viewing share (total)
GBN 0.62% - 0.49% - 0.30%
BBC 1.15% - 1.41% - 1.30%
Sky 0.67% - 0.75% - 0.68%
Google trends are looking even worse https://trends.google.co.uk/trends/explo...=gb%20news
Adsales101 - thanks for sharing.
I know next to nothing about your industry so I'd appreciate your help trying to understand it.
Is 1.35m reach enough in terms of selling (after agency fees) £25m worth of advertising a year? Or does that depend on the wealth of the demographics who consume it the most?
I am fascinated by your sector (being in marketing myself) and it'd be great if you could share your knowledge with us.
TIA

While a stunt by Harri, it's one way of ensuring balance during the day in the same way LBC does when they have a more liberal discussion, which allows them to do their more OTT material with Wootton later today.
James Martin post_id=27601 time= user_id=872 Wrote:James2001 post_id=27597 time= user_id=956 Wrote:At this point, "woke" just means "any opinion I don't like".
I don't like all the online hate for GB News - does that make me woke then?
Actually I think that's definitely one in the eye for anyone who said it was anti-woke.
Andrew Neil himself labelled it anti-woke. It was literally in the dog whistling press releases they were putting out pre launch. The channel has spent much of it's first month of existence stoking the fire over the "woke virtue signalling" England team taking the knee so any attempt now at faux outrage is as transparent and hypocritical as everyone else's who has been publicly called out this past 24hrs.
johnnyboy post_id=27605 time= user_id=925 Wrote:Adsales101 - thanks for sharing.
I know next to nothing about your industry so I'd appreciate your help trying to understand it.
Is 1.35m reach enough in terms of selling (after agency fees) £25m worth of advertising a year? Or does that depend on the wealth of the demographics who consume it the most?
I am fascinated by your sector (being in marketing myself) and it'd be great if you could share your knowledge with us.
TIA 
If it were a standalone sales operation then definitely no chance. Using Sky Media makes it a bit more feasible but personally I think it's a big task to achieve it. There's things that can be tried and changed but the figures for the latest period aren't much better than some of the "channel in a box" broadcasters which need a fraction of what GBN needs to break even.
We don't know how deep the pockets of the investors are so these numbers and the associated income from advertising may be perfectly fine.
A very niche grumble I know, but why does Liam Halligan insist on constantly calling his show 'Gloria and Liam' when it's called 'DePiero and Halligan'. You'd think someone would have pointed it out to him by now?
Blobs post_id=27612 time= user_id=758 Wrote:James Martin post_id=27601 time= user_id=872 Wrote:James2001 post_id=27597 time= user_id=956 Wrote:At this point, "woke" just means "any opinion I don't like".
I don't like all the online hate for GB News - does that make me woke then?
Actually I think that's definitely one in the eye for anyone who said it was anti-woke.
Andrew Neil himself labelled it anti-woke. It was literally in the dog whistling press releases they were putting out pre launch. The channel has spent much of it's first month of existence stoking the fire over the "woke virtue signalling" England team taking the knee so any attempt now at faux outrage is as transparent and hypocritical as everyone else's who has been publicly called out this past 24hrs.
Don't forget one of their headline segments is "woke watch".
The channel has not tried to hide the fact it doesn't like woke. That is one of the reasons it exists.
The whole take the knee GB News stuff was over the choice of individual players to take the knee, and if it was right for such things to be mixed with sport which is generally a very bringing together type thing anyway. It was not about being against stopping racism, which some people have been trying to suggest.
Many on here forgetting that it wasn't a month of one way traffic with discussion about taking the knee. There has been counter-arguments and discussions on various shows on GB News. Obviously, people forget to mention that for reasons we all know.