Natasha's Law was brought about because she had an allergic reaction to a baguette that was purchased at a Pret a Manger at Heathrow Airport. The dough contained sesame seeds, but wasn't labelled as such. She was ill on the subsequent flight.
I don't think that food labelling can be related to peanuts on planes.
derek500j post_id=44752 time= user_id=1363 Wrote:Natasha's Law was brought about because she had an allergic reaction to a baguette that was purchased at a Pret a Manger at Heathrow Airport. The dough contained sesame seeds, but wasn't labelled as such. She was ill on the subsequent flight.
I don't think that food labelling can be related to peanuts on planes.
I've been on flights for many years before that incident where they've requested nuts aren't eaten on board so yes unrelated. Ultimately the important thing to remember with the request to not consume nuts on a plane is that it's an inconvenience to absolutely no one.
derek500j post_id=44752 time= user_id=1363 Wrote:Natasha's Law was brought about because she had an allergic reaction to a baguette that was purchased at a Pret a Manger at Heathrow Airport. The dough contained sesame seeds, but wasn't labelled as such. She was ill on the subsequent flight.
I don't think that food labelling can be related to peanuts on planes.
I’m not waiting to derail this thread talking about new laws, allergens and peanuts too much, so I’ll keep this as brief as I can.
As I pointed out in my initial reply, they were slightly different subject matter however both about allergens and the impacts they can cause and both happen to also involve aircraft, although granted within different context. Colin Brazier’s tweet appears to downplay or at the very least seeks to ‘debate’ the need to be cautious when it comes to allergenic ingredients on a day when a law was brought in after the death of a young girl due to allergens which to me seems pretty crass.
I thought GB News had a great area for their Labour Conference space last week, but not too keen on their Tory Party conference space, it's too close to people attending the event.
To be fair, Harwood was specifically referring to broadcasters. A reply from a non-invited press journalist is irrelevant.
Did anyone ever discover a reason for them replacing the bigger screen in the desk area with the smaller one (which I believe is touchscreen)? They must just have the bigger round sitting around somewhere.
It was probably due to a terrible interlacing effect they had. Although I think that was partly due to camera set up as I’m not sure changing the screen instantly got rid of it. However it looks good now. It’s just the rest of the set they need to sort out.
The main camera on the Farage set is still shocking. Lots of noise.
derek500j post_id=45024 time= user_id=1363 Wrote:To be fair, Harwood was specifically referring to broadcasters. A reply from a non-invited press journalist is irrelevant.
It's true you shouldn't compare the two, one has a paying audience of over half a million a day (plus all those that read his material for free online and elsewhere) The other has a show on a TV channel with a far smaller audience (being very kind there) and a lot less/no standing in the world of journalism.
GB News seemingly taking the signed version of the conference
as seen on YouTube, but the box containing it is hidden underneath their on-screen furniture. The other broadcasters taking the clean feed with a different camera.
![[Image: 1633516573_1615513986.jpg]](https://up.metropol247.co.uk/102021/1633516573_1615513986.jpg)
valley post_id=45264 time= user_id=971 Wrote:GB News seemingly taking the signed version of the conference as seen on YouTube, but the box containing it is hidden underneath their on-screen furniture. The other broadcasters taking the clean feed with a different camera.
But managing to get the Colour Balance wrong...
Does no one check their output for the basics?
Fluffy Bunny Feet post_id=45486 time= user_id=1311 Wrote:valley post_id=45264 time= user_id=971 Wrote:GB News seemingly taking the signed version of the conference as seen on YouTube, but the box containing it is hidden underneath their on-screen furniture. The other broadcasters taking the clean feed with a different camera.
But managing to get the Colour Balance wrong...
Does no one check their output for the basics?
Presumably because that’s what it looks like on that YouTube feed itself.