TV Live Forum

Full Version: BBC One: 2022 Idents
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Moz post_id=76470 time= user_id=746 Wrote:
IanJRedman post_id=76468 time= user_id=958 Wrote:The lens animation itself looks a little flat. Is it my imagination, or is the lens in the idents less "3D" than in the blips? I'd have preferred if the lens was more of an "object" in these idents; whereas currently it looks like a transitional effect.

No, not your imagination. Totally agree with this. It’s much more “flat” in the idents.
I just realised, right now, why it's throwing me off slightly. When we glimpse the lens at the start of trails, it has a more 3D, almost glass-like appearance. If it was like that in the idents, but with the alternative scenes somehow rendered 'inside' the lens, I think it would look much better!
Well, that's it from me tonight it seems!
[Image: JGZblwx.png]
ConorM98 post_id=76451 time=1648849481 user_id=983 Wrote:You mean One? Have you not studied math?

Moz post_id=76458 time= user_id=746 Wrote:It’s maths. Have you not studied English!?

No need to be rude.
I've been at work all evening, so thank you to those who have uploaded video content tonight. I'll be going through mine in the morning.
Newsman post_id=76460 time= user_id=2463 Wrote:I have quite an unnatural sense of relief that Oneness has gone. These idents are adaptable and will grow. They’re beautiful. And suddenly that BBC1 form-up lens, glimpsed a few months ago, makes sense. I know. Anything would have been better than Oneness. But BBC1 has become alive for me again tonight. .
Like I said, I know. I’m not like the other boys.
Fear not, you’re not alone. I’m a big fan of them already. Love the concept of the lens, and love what it’s showing…the same scene at different times of day. Some work better than others but it’s a lovely idea and they are, as you say, beautiful to look at. Added into the bits of the package we’ve already seen, this is the best BBC ONE has looked for a very long time. Since the unedited circles at least.
Josh post_id=76476 time= user_id=955 Wrote:Well, that's it from me tonight it seems!
[Image: JGZblwx.png]
Thank you for the uploads Josh! Much appreciated!!
BBC Creative said on their Instagram account that there will be 24 idents to look out for.

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cb0issej7nh...=copy_link
Looks good that ManvsMachine quality for making BBC One idents equally matching Superunion do for BBC Two and Three idents. However, i previously expecting Superunion for making these idents
The trouble with BBC ONE idents especially, is that several of us create an illusion in our minds as to what they should be like, and when that illusion becomes fantasy and reality hits home, we are disappointed because our expectations were not honoured. That's why some don't like the new ones. With Oneness universally slated by all but a tiny number, you'd think that anything would be better than that. Yet here we are, still people saying they don't like them or complaining that they're not up to the mark. Of course people are entitled to their own opinion, and I respect that.

One of the criticisms about Oneness was the static appearance of the image. It was basically a camera and people staring into it looking gormless. The "lens" idents have, by contrast, some stunningly magnificent camera work. The way that some images are filmed as if going in a solid circle and falling in front or behind the ONE logo, is lovely. It is a far better concept than Oneness, and I would even suggest that it's actually, the natural progression of the circles era. The Lens itself may or may not look better if it was glass like and on screen longer, but we won't actually know that since it isn't! I like the new idents. They are modern and intricate whilst giving BBC ONE a long overdue symbol. The Lens is a good idea since BBC One is our lens on the world.
I know this will probably be an unpopular opinion for sure but... I'm gonna miss Oneness a little. Don't get me wrong, they were dull and these are a huge step up, but I guess I just got used to it.
NancerOnTheLIVEForum post_id=76490 time= user_id=1794 Wrote:I know this will probably be an unpopular opinion for sure but... I'm gonna miss Oneness a little. Don't get me wrong, they were dull and these are a huge step up, but I guess I just got used to it.
It's funny how you get used to things - the camera movement in the new set is almost jarring considering how long we've been used to a locked on shot - almost motion sickness inducing infact, but apparently they've been tested for that.

I just wish they were a bit more fun, a bit more fantasy, and perhaps a bit bolder with the central idea. I do like the three idents in one concept though meaning idents reference each other, but they feel more BBC4 than BBC1 IMO. Kind of a similar concept with different perspectives on the same scene.
SteveRW post_id=76489 time= user_id=2173 Wrote:The trouble with BBC ONE idents especially, is that several of us create an illusion in our minds as to what they should be like, and when that illusion becomes fantasy and reality hits home, we are disappointed because our expectations were not honoured. That's why some don't like the new ones. With Oneness universally slated by all but a tiny number, you'd think that anything would be better than that. Yet here we are, still people saying they don't like them or complaining that they're not up to the mark. Of course people are entitled to their own opinion, and I respect that.

One of the criticisms about Oneness was the static appearance of the image. It was basically a camera and people staring into it looking gormless. The "lens" idents have, by contrast, some stunningly magnificent camera work. The way that some images are filmed as if going in a solid circle and falling in front or behind the ONE logo, is lovely. It is a far better concept than Oneness, and I would even suggest that it's actually, the natural progression of the circles era. The Lens itself may or may not look better if it was glass like and on screen longer, but we won't actually know that since it isn't! I like the new idents. They are modern and intricate whilst giving BBC ONE a long overdue symbol. The Lens is a good idea since BBC One is our lens on the world.

Thanks for this, the truth. While I did agree, Oneness was a little dull (and will be missed by me), I tend to think that any new change will be frowned upon, because it's not like the "great past". If we let nostalgia fully judge a new work (it can still be judged by nostalgia, but just a little), we close our minds to any new ideas and concepts, or highly criticize such new ideas to the point of swaying one's initial positive opinion. Case in point: this forum.
Moz post_id=76455 time= user_id=746 Wrote:So the BBC One idents are to me a clear loser in the Chameleon rebrand. The worst of everything I’ve seen so far. Just dull as ditchwater.

Weirdly BBC Two’s are better - and they didn’t even change the ident. They just worked with the top & bottom framing.

Massive missed opportunity.

But… they can rescue this. I like the lens idea. It just needs ratcheting up. More of the lens, appearing from start to finish. At no point should it just be the scene without the lens. The other elements should keep appearing - however briefly - all the way through.

Disagree on the "worst of everything in the BBC rebrand" claim so far. It's only bad because our metric is somehow just "greater than Oneness" and nothing else. I'd say, these are really lovely idents, and it was interesting to see a concept hinted by the Christmas idents of 2021 to truly come to light. I also feel this is a better homage to the Globe idents than Circles.
DavidWhitfield post_id=76404 time= user_id=1016 Wrote:Where this effect works really well:

[Image: 277416867_1240381086492958_1763106752812...e=626EE046]

Immediately obvious that it's the same field. The fence and trees are present throughout all three scenes and you can follow them whichever scene(s) are being shown. You can't fail to understand that it's one plot of land with different things happening on it at different times.

Where this effect falls flat:

[Image: 277462246_1532870790442706_5723714126137...e=626DC1F5]

Even having been told EXACTLY what the concept is and that it's DEFINITELY the same place, I still cannot see how this is supposed to be the same location. If I can't, and I'm deliberately LOOKING for the similarities, then I struggle to imagine how your standard viewer will 'get' this one.

The lens effect needs to be on screen for longer, in my opinion. You currently get only a very brief shot of some other things happening over the top of the main scene and then it's gone. It would help to get across the concept if people had more opportunity to see the three scenes concurrently, I feel.
That sums up the issue nicely - with the indoor ones especially they need to ensure there are clear features which are present in all three scenes to tie them together.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35