TV Live Forum

And even the CW DC shows they look to be wanting rid of. They didn't pick up the three newest ones - Batwoman went to E4, Stargirl went to Amazon, and I don't think Superman and Lois was picked up at all in the UK.

A post on the Sky Community seems to suggest it may be on what I presume is the Virgin Media Store?
https://helpforum.sky.com/t5/What-s-On/s...-p/3713452

JAS84 post_id=32558 time= user_id=881 Wrote:And even the CW DC shows they look to be wanting rid of. They didn't pick up the three newest ones - Batwoman went to E4, Stargirl went to Amazon, and I don't think Superman and Lois was picked up at all in the UK.

Plus Black Lightning before that

I don't think Batwoman lasted long at 9pm on E4 either, although arguably such shows struggle to stand up on their own compared to airing alongside similar shows on the same channel.

Sky should consider changing Pick TV to Sky One. I think it’s a brand that’s still got good recognition and would help boost its Freeview reach.

I’ve always thought that if they tried a bit harder Sky One could have been the natural UK ‘Channel 6’ - problem was in the late 90s and throughout the 2000s corporate Sky was too focused on sport and movies.
It’s only in the past 10 years with the UK commissions it really started to stand out. Sadly Sky lost interest with Atlantic and the HBO deal.

Jexedback post_id=33013 time= user_id=1018 Wrote:Sky should consider changing Pick TV to Sky One. I think it’s a brand that’s still got good recognition and would help boost its Freeview reach.

I’ve always thought that if they tried a bit harder Sky One could have been the natural UK ‘Channel 6’ - problem was in the late 90s and throughout the 2000s corporate Sky was too focused on sport and movies.
It’s only in the past 10 years with the UK commissions it really started to stand out. Sadly Sky lost interest with Atlantic and the HBO deal.

How did they need to try a bit harder?

Jexedback post_id=33013 time=1628369871 user_id=1018 Wrote:Sky should consider changing Pick TV to Sky One. I think it’s a brand that’s still got good recognition and would help boost its Freeview reach.

I’ve always thought that if they tried a bit harder Sky One could have been the natural UK ‘Channel 6’ - problem was in the late 90s and throughout the 2000s corporate Sky was too focused on sport and movies.
It’s only in the past 10 years with the UK commissions it really started to stand out. Sadly Sky lost interest with Atlantic and the HBO deal.

Didn’t Pick used to be Sky 2 or 3?

Pick was Sky3 until February 2011.

all new Phil post_id=33017 time= user_id=865 Wrote:

Jexedback post_id=33013 time= user_id=1018 Wrote:Sky should consider changing Pick TV to Sky One. I think it’s a brand that’s still got good recognition and would help boost its Freeview reach.

I’ve always thought that if they tried a bit harder Sky One could have been the natural UK ‘Channel 6’ - problem was in the late 90s and throughout the 2000s corporate Sky was too focused on sport and movies.
It’s only in the past 10 years with the UK commissions it really started to stand out. Sadly Sky lost interest with Atlantic and the HBO deal.

How did they need to try a bit harder?

In the late 90s and early 2000s the channel was obsessed with Star Trek spin-offs, Simpsons and that terrible Dreamteam as one of their only UK commissions. It was content with a narrow appeal.
They could and should have built a schedule like the current Channel 5 with some populist British stuff around selected imports. Earlier investment in content away from sport and movies could have helped drive a bigger audience share - might have helped drive subscribers too. Look at the premium of original content now.

Channel 5 is a public service and must have a certain amount of local content, Sky One is not, it wouldn't have that much local content even if it were FTA.

Moreover, it's a successful channel, even if it doesn't have those populist docureality shows and the likes (honestly, I could live without them anyways!)

Though I think with fewer, bigger productions Sky 1 in recent years has contributed hugely to original productions in the UK, more so than both C4 and C5 when it comes to scripted content.

Jexedback post_id=33032 time= user_id=1018 Wrote:

all new Phil post_id=33017 time= user_id=865 Wrote:

Jexedback post_id=33013 time= user_id=1018 Wrote:Sky should consider changing Pick TV to Sky One. I think it’s a brand that’s still got good recognition and would help boost its Freeview reach.

I’ve always thought that if they tried a bit harder Sky One could have been the natural UK ‘Channel 6’ - problem was in the late 90s and throughout the 2000s corporate Sky was too focused on sport and movies.
It’s only in the past 10 years with the UK commissions it really started to stand out. Sadly Sky lost interest with Atlantic and the HBO deal.

How did they need to try a bit harder?

In the late 90s and early 2000s the channel was obsessed with Star Trek spin-offs, Simpsons and that terrible Dreamteam as one of their only UK commissions. It was content with a narrow appeal.
They could and should have built a schedule like the current Channel 5 with some populist British stuff around selected imports. Earlier investment in content away from sport and movies could have helped drive a bigger audience share - might have helped drive subscribers too. Look at the premium of original content now.

The only Sky 1 commissions that I can ever remember really penetrating public consciousness were An Idiot Abroad and before that Gladiators revival (briefly). Even then I'd be hard pushed to suggest people were driven to subscribe so they could watch these.

Like it or not, The Simpsons and Star Trek once commanded an audience who would be motivated enough to subscribe to watch those things.

WillPS post_id=33132 time=1628435955 user_id=769 Wrote:The only Sky 1 commissions that I can ever remember really penetrating public consciousness were An Idiot Abroad and before that Gladiators revival (briefly). Even then I'd be hard pushed to suggest people were driven to subscribe so they could watch these.

Like it or not, The Simpsons and Star Trek once commanded an audience who would be motivated enough to subscribe to watch those things.

Seem to remember Ibiza Uncovered doing well for them in the late 1990s, so much so that it was picked up by Channel 4.

About the only time I remember seeing a Sky One endcap on terrestrial TV.

WillPS post_id=33132 time=1628435955 user_id=769 Wrote:

Jexedback post_id=33032 time= user_id=1018 Wrote:

all new Phil post_id=33017 time= user_id=865 Wrote:How did they need to try a bit harder?

In the late 90s and early 2000s the channel was obsessed with Star Trek spin-offs, Simpsons and that terrible Dreamteam as one of their only UK commissions. It was content with a narrow appeal.
They could and should have built a schedule like the current Channel 5 with some populist British stuff around selected imports. Earlier investment in content away from sport and movies could have helped drive a bigger audience share - might have helped drive subscribers too. Look at the premium of original content now.

The only Sky 1 commissions that I can ever remember really penetrating public consciousness were An Idiot Abroad and before that Gladiators revival (briefly). Even then I'd be hard pushed to suggest people were driven to subscribe so they could watch these.

Like it or not, The Simpsons and Star Trek once commanded an audience who would be motivated enough to subscribe to watch those things.

Indeed I remember the days where I would subscribe to sky just to watch Star Trek, Stargate SG1, and the Simpsons. Star Trek and the Simpsons were also on bbc two at some stage. Not forgetting shows like Lost which were massive at the time.

The only sky one produced content I can remember, is kenny vs spennny, or similar in naming for a U.K. version, an idiot abroad and other stuff I can’t remember the name of but did watch at the time.

Other big channels were Bravo, men and motors and Granda plus on Sky. I still miss a lot of the Bravo content that never got shown again.

Brainiac was a fairly big hit for them I think. It's amazing how cheap the show looked if you watch it back now. I'd say most Sky shows today look pretty premium and feel like they've had a decent budget whereas Brainiac and their other UK shows around that time looked like proper low budget affairs.