Doctor Who
#16
Joe post_id=30771 time= user_id=1035 Wrote:
Humphrey Hacker post_id=30756 time= user_id=1128 Wrote:It's basically **** on its history and its fans by the ludicrous "timeless child".

Why? The reasons escape me. Maybe its socio-political or maybe Chibnall and others wee being total dicks.



Bit much, no?

Not really, No. Obviously the show has changed over the years to accommodate the social and political changes in the world going as far back as Pertwee's era. and that is to be lauded but the Timeless Child effectively ripped the heart out of the show.
<t>An Autie but not a naughty.</t>
#17
Humphrey Hacker post_id=30808 time= user_id=1128 Wrote:
Joe post_id=30771 time= user_id=1035 Wrote:
Humphrey Hacker post_id=30756 time= user_id=1128 Wrote:It's basically **** on its history and its fans by the ludicrous "timeless child".

Why? The reasons escape me. Maybe its socio-political or maybe Chibnall and others wee being total dicks.



Bit much, no?

Not really, No. Obviously the show has changed over the years to accommodate the social and political changes in the world going as far back as Pertwee's era. and that is to be lauded but the Timeless Child effectively ripped the heart out of the show.

Of course you're totally entitled to that view, but IMO, the Timeless Child did no such thing - it added to the mythos of the show, it didn't really change any of it. Everything we'd seen up to that point still 'happened' - there was just a lot more (pre-history, if you like) that we didn't know about. I think it actually added to the mystery, really.
#18
IanJRedman post_id=30826 time= user_id=958 Wrote:
Humphrey Hacker post_id=30808 time= user_id=1128 Wrote:
Joe post_id=30771 time= user_id=1035 Wrote:Bit much, no?

Not really, No. Obviously the show has changed over the years to accommodate the social and political changes in the world going as far back as Pertwee's era. and that is to be lauded but the Timeless Child effectively ripped the heart out of the show.

Of course you're totally entitled to that view, but IMO, the Timeless Child did no such thing - it added to the mythos of the show, it didn't really change any of it. Everything we'd seen up to that point still 'happened' - there was just a lot more (pre-history, if you like) that we didn't know about. I think it actually added to the mystery, really.

You make a very valid point about the pre-history but I just felt it corrupted the narrative.

I agree with the consensus that to return to a male doctor after Jodie would be a misfire. Obviously Jo Martin as the next Doctor would be the natural move but I also feel that Olivia Colman or Nicola Walker would also be great choices.
<t>An Autie but not a naughty.</t>
#19
People forget one BIG thing when they speak about possible actors becoming the next doctor, SALARY.

People like Olivia Coleman earns a fortune now, and her agent would command a fee which the BBC would be unwilling to pay for her to become the next doctor.

The names of celebrities I have seen put about, as the possible next doctor makes me laugh, as there is not a chance in hell the BBC could afford them.

Peter Capaldi was paid no more than £250,000 a year for his time as the doctor. Can you imagine the amount Olivia Coleman's agent would want for her to become the doctor?
#20
One wonders if the show will even be continued once the current doctor leaves. It has become a bit of a mess. Just as it did the last time it was ended, but in very different ways. Maybe it is time for another break.
#21
Humphrey Hacker post_id=30951 time= user_id=1128 Wrote:I agree with the consensus that to return to a male doctor after Jodie would be a misfire. Obviously Jo Martin as the next Doctor would be the natural move but I also feel that Olivia Colman or Nicola Walker would also be great choices.

Highly disagree about Olivia Colman, even if she was viable financially. A brilliant actor does not necessarily equal a brilliant Doctor, and I just can’t see her being successful in the role.

My pick even since before Jodie was revealed has been Alexander Vlahos. He was brilliant in Versailles and would hark back to David Tennant and Matt Smith’s incarnations nicely, because - let’s face it - they were the most successful of the modern age. He’s young, quirky, has quite ethereal/gender-neutral features, he's a massive fan of the show, and he's Welsh - so there’s the one box ticked that hasn’t been before Wink

[Image: Schon_Magazine_ALEXVLAHOS-1000x647.jpg]
#22
Oh, go on then, here's my pick - Himesh Patel.
#23
Flux post_id=31068 time= user_id=766 Wrote:My pick even since before Jodie was revealed has been Alexander Vlahos. He was brilliant in Versailles and would hark back to David Tennant and Matt Smith’s incarnations nicely, because - let’s face it - they were the most successful of the modern age. He’s young, quirky, has quite ethereal/gender-neutral features, he's a massive fan of the show, and he's Welsh - so there’s the one box ticked that hasn’t been before Wink

Alexander is a good shout - I've rated him since he was in The Indian Doctor.

I'd add Luke Newberry to the list.
#24
I still think Paterson Joseph would be a great Doctor
#25
sjames post_id=31359 time= user_id=1376 Wrote:I still think Paterson Joseph would be a great Doctor

He's proven himself to be intelligent and cunning by strategically keeping easy-to-beat Rose Tyler in The Weakest Link to come out as the winner... but then again, he did get killed by a dalek after refusing to accept their existence, so... I'm on the fence. :lol:

(Christ, this is a niche (sixteen year old) reference!)
"Good evening. Dull, grey, cold, miserable - and that's just me. The weather hasn't been great, either."
#26
Flux post_id=31068 time= user_id=766 Wrote:
Humphrey Hacker post_id=30951 time= user_id=1128 Wrote:I agree with the consensus that to return to a male doctor after Jodie would be a misfire. Obviously Jo Martin as the next Doctor would be the natural move but I also feel that Olivia Colman or Nicola Walker would also be great choices.

Highly disagree about Olivia Colman, even if she was viable financially. A brilliant actor does not necessarily equal a brilliant Doctor, and I just can’t see her being successful in the role.

My pick even since before Jodie was revealed has been Alexander Vlahos. He was brilliant in Versailles and would hark back to David Tennant and Matt Smith’s incarnations nicely, because - let’s face it - they were the most successful of the modern age. He’s young, quirky, has quite ethereal/gender-neutral features, he's a massive fan of the show, and he's Welsh - so there’s the one box ticked that hasn’t been before Wink

[Image: Schon_Magazine_ALEXVLAHOS-1000x647.jpg]
Didn't he play older Mordred in Merlin?

I think they'll probably for either another female Doctor or a non white male Doctor. Alfred Enoch would be a good choice although he is a bit young.
#27
IanJRedman post_id=24200 time= user_id=958 Wrote:
Jon post_id=24189 time= user_id=1050 Wrote:
CameronYoung post_id=24184 time= user_id=1509 Wrote:https://twitter.com/tvukzone/status/1409...85920?s=19

He's not going to be the next Doctor Who, just standard tabloid drivel.
Regarding the certainty that the next Doctor will be a woman, does that Twitter have any actual insider knowledge? Or is it just making assumptions?
I think it's just an assumption - but FWIW, I think I agree. To go straight back to a male, after one female incarnation, would make Jodie's era look tokenistic, or possibly even give the impression of a failure. I'd say they're more likely to go for another woman, before looking at both male and female actors for the next Doctors after that (if the show continues for that long).

What about just choosing the best actor for the role. Whatever their gender/sexuality/race/hair colour.
#28
Humphrey Hacker post_id=30756 time= user_id=1128 Wrote:As a self-confessed "classic whovian" I am seriously disappointed with the show. Now I want to make clear that this isn't a slur against anyone but against the show in particular. It's lost its way. It's basically **** on its history and its fans by the ludicrous "timeless child".

Why? The reasons escape me. Maybe its socio-political or maybe Chibnall and others wee being total dicks.

I think whats needed is get the regeneration out of the way and take the show off the air for a couple of years.

There could be a possibility that your no longer the target audience and you have changed alto the point where Dr who no longer works for you.

People change and tastes change. I've not seen anyi of this incarnation yet as I wanted to go back and re watch all the new who. Some I loved first time round but less this time and 9ther episodes vice versa.
<t>When I finally decided to get involved.. I was consistent</t>
#29
This week's worst kept secret

https://twitter.com/bbcpress/status/1420746479585488903
#30
BcastCornwall post_id=31547 time= user_id=950 Wrote:This week's worst kept secret

https://twitter.com/bbcpress/status/1420746479585488903
The most intriguing part of this, is the blockbuster special next year for the BBC's 100th anniversary, this makes me wonder what they will have in store for the 60th anniversary in 2023


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Powered by MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme designed by m0ckingbird © 2015-2026.