Sky News Australia to rebrand as Fox News?
#1
Seems like it's going to happen...

Quote:It seems almost certain that Sky News Australia will rebrand as Fox News in the coming months, if not weeks, according to multiple sources.

https://tvblackbox.com.au/page/2021/05/0...d_id=47042
I'm on Andover Radio every Saturday afternoon from 4pm-6pm. Follow me on Twitter.
#2
Not at all surprised. Sky News AU is very reminiscent of Fox News with it's heavy right-wing agenda.

I personally see this as a good thing, utilising a well-known right-leaning name, instead of using the brand of something completely different in terms of execution.

It also makes sense given how Murdoch doesn't own the Sky brand anymore, but continues to, and probably always will, operate Fox News.
<r><I><s></s>Never forget TV Forum.<e></e></I></r>
#3
If true, it's good news for Sky (UK). The Australian and British channels don't have much in common these days. Sky News is a reputable news service, with a strong stable of domestic and international correspondents. Sky News Australia is... not.

And probably good news for Sky News Australia to be honest. They've been operating like a poor man's Fox News for years now. Greater involvement/influence from New York might well lift the quality of their primetime opinion programming. Many of Sky News Australia's opinion presenters are (IMO) unwatchable. Sky News Australia has tended to take provocative newspaper columnists, radio hosts or ex-politicians and plonk them in front of a camera. But merely being provocative is no guarantee that one is an engaging presenter - and that's where Sky News Australia falls short. While it's not my cup of tea, Fox News has managed to build up a portfolio of watchable hosts with strong/provocative views.

With all that said, it's not the first time I've heard the suggestion of Sky News Australia being rebranded as Fox News Australia. It makes sense on many levels. But the argument against such a move has always been that (at least among decision makers) "Sky News" is an established brand in the Australian market. I'm not immediately convinced that the case for a rebrand has suddenly become more compelling.
#4
Mr Q post_id=10564 time=1620111564 user_id=834 Wrote:With all that said, it's not the first time I've heard the suggestion of Sky News Australia being rebranded as Fox News Australia. It makes sense on many levels. But the argument against such a move has always been that (at least among decision makers) "Sky News" is an established brand in the Australian market. I'm not immediately convinced that the case for a rebrand has suddenly become more compelling.
Sky News is an established brand in Australia, but Fox is probably a bigger one there through Foxtel and all the Fox channels on there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxtel

I wonder if they are paying Comcast for the Sky brand, or if there was some sort of deal done when the demerger happened?
#5
It will be interesting to see what Sky News UK does - there’s been a fair bit of correspondent sharing even post-Murdoch departure. Will they end up with a dedicated Oceania correspondent if they no longer want to use Sky News Australia journalists on-air, or are there reporters for NBC (etc.) who they may use instead?
#6
I'm going to assume that there's a lot of personnel redundancies from after the merger and will be leaning on NBC News reporters a bit more for Oceania-based reporting, that or take someone from other Asian bureaus and extend their footprint to cover that too.
#7
Inspector Sands post_id=10569 time=1620112693 user_id=1003 Wrote:
Mr Q post_id=10564 time=1620111564 user_id=834 Wrote:With all that said, it's not the first time I've heard the suggestion of Sky News Australia being rebranded as Fox News Australia. It makes sense on many levels. But the argument against such a move has always been that (at least among decision makers) "Sky News" is an established brand in the Australian market. I'm not immediately convinced that the case for a rebrand has suddenly become more compelling.
Sky News is an established brand in Australia, but Fox is probably a bigger one there through Foxtel and all the Fox channels on there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxtel

I wonder if they are paying Comcast for the Sky brand, or if there was some sort of deal done when the demerger happened?
I completely accept "Fox" is a known name in Australia too. But with an established identity in Sky News (Australia), it's not costless in terms of branding and recognition to shift to something else.

On your question: according to the article, there was a deal in place to allow Sky News Australia to retain the "Sky" brand for five years. It's the first I recall seeing a specific time limit mentioned.
#8
Note that Comcast's NBC has a long standing partnership with Channel 7 in Australia. May be Sky News in the UK can use their resources.
#9
Only problem is the statement added to the start of the article:

Quote:UPDATE: A representative for Lachlan Murdoch tells us:
“There is absolutely no plans to rebrand Sky News as Fox News. It is simply not true”.
The original story is below
#10
DAS post_id=10589 time=1620121342 user_id=748 Wrote:Only problem is the statement added to the start of the article:

Quote:UPDATE: A representative for Lachlan Murdoch tells us:
“There is absolutely no plans to rebrand Sky News as Fox News. It is simply not true”.
The original story is below

Oh well... as you were. Smile
I'm on Andover Radio every Saturday afternoon from 4pm-6pm. Follow me on Twitter.
#11
In any case, while there's an evening segment of right-wing opinion, the rolling news element of Sky News Australia is no different to the UK.
#12
Well throwing my two pence in. As we didnt see the full statement from Lachlan he denied the name change will be FoxNews. But its interesting that he didnt say there wont be a name change. These PR reps for big companies are masters of not saying whats clearly obvious. I do think this situation still bears watching very closely. Also the fact there's trademark and domain registered doesnt mean something isnt happening behind the scenes and we might see a name change in the near future. They will typically register MULTIPLE trademarks or domains at the same time. So the actual name may have been registered alongside FOXNEWS AU so as to prevent someone from grabbing it and using it. I cant see NBCU allowing Sky's name continue to be tarnished by this opinion channel masquerading as a news channel. American companies are big on image and branding. Its not a matter if the name will change its a matter of when.
<r>"When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time" - Maya Angelou <E>8-)</E></r>
#13
Does Fox News not have a the same reputation in AUS? They could have thought of a new name.

Edit: Looks like they will if it's not going to be Fox
#14
Watch them change it to FoxTel News Channel. And then the pr svengali's say something like....We are creaing a new unique brand for Australia's original news channel, blah blah. Australia's News channel by Australians with an Australian name...blah blah blah.
<r>"When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time" - Maya Angelou <E>8-)</E></r>
#15
Dare I suggest "The Australian News & Talk", taking name from News Corp Australia's nationwide newspaper?


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Powered by MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme designed by m0ckingbird © 2015-2026.