25-04-2021, 06:53 PM
XIII post_id=8936 time=1619348635 user_id=894 Wrote:Neil Jones post_id=8910 time=1619334920 user_id=961 Wrote:Pretty similar to cases in a "real" court I presume then, where they have to be more sure than not they're applying appropriate parts of law for the case in question, taking breaks on occasion to get advice? Judge Rinder cases tend to be more about who broke the vase and who should pay to replace it or "am I liable to pay for the DJ who played crap music" as opposed to more serious matters, but I believe (much like the American Judge Judy) any "you owe him £1500" comes out of the production fund, the matter is closed and you get the honour of having your fizzog on the TV for 20 minutes.I assume much like Judge Judy, by appearing on Judge Rinder, you have to agree not to take the case any further once the dispute is settled.
Well that goes without saying, surely? Defeats the whole point of having a court system otherwise, you'd have people going "don't like that ruling from Court A, I'll go to Court B and see if they'll give me a better one".
Can't recall at the moment but there is a term/process to agree to/follow to allow a TV courtroom to have legal enforcement which doesn't provide an option to go to another court afterwards, unless the case is dismissed (in the case of Judge Judy) without prejudice, not sure what the UK equivalent of that is.