Good Morning Britain
[quote=DavidWhitfield post_id=74483 time= user_id=1016]
Interesting promo here.

<t>I may not contribute much, but I will, where I can.</t>
[quote=watchingtv post_id=74604 time= user_id=1243]
[quote=DavidWhitfield post_id=74483 time= user_id=1016]
Interesting promo here.

[quote=watchingtv post_id=74604 time= user_id=1243]
[quote=DavidWhitfield post_id=74483 time= user_id=1016]
Interesting promo here.

The graphics didn’t have all the 3D-ness when they first launched in 2009. They upgrade to Vizrt and suddenly went mad with it.

Classic just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.
That was the day they also added a woman whispering "Lorraine" during her show's coming up sequence, which was dropped because Lorraine couldn't stop laughing at it.
[Image: 1592580878_1869298444.svg]
Martin Lewis back on Wednesday with what is being billed a "Cost of Living" special.
@Brekkietweets
I think it is time Good Morning Britain had a complete overhaul and revamp and either a regular replacement for Piers or as someone suggested a while back: Susannah at the helm but people feeding off.

I have been off sick the last two weeks and hardly tuned in. At one time it would be on whilst lay in bed.
Ben Shatliff post_id=75029 time= user_id=1213 Wrote:I think it is time Good Morning Britain had a complete overhaul and revamp
What. Why? It looks perfectly fine. I don’t understand why people here think GMB (which still looks pretty identical to how it looked at launch to most viewers) is always bordering on a revamp.
Ben Shatliff post_id=75029 time= user_id=1213 Wrote:I think it is time Good Morning Britain had a complete overhaul and revamp and either a regular replacement for Piers or as someone suggested a while back: Susannah at the helm but people feeding off.

I have been off sick the last two weeks and hardly tuned in. At one time it would be on whilst lay in bed.

I’m not sure I fully agree with the the former statement on needs for overhauls etc. But I do agree with the fact I also used to be regular viewer, but I actually don’t tune in anymore either. I can’t actually put down 100% why that is.

I do think the guest presenter thing isn’t great, because you don’t know what to expect one day to the next. You could get the a more relaxed but awkward, partridge style of Richard Madeley. Or Adil Ray, always looking to crack a gag while trying to provide a serious agenda. On the other hand you’ve got someone like Martin Lewis, who obviously brings a certain focus but also has a more fast paced style. I think unlike the One Show where the presenter doesn’t dictate, ad lib or have a lot of deviation, GMB as it stands focuses a lot on the two presenters with opinion and leading discussion and personal style.
Ben Shatliff post_id=75029 time= user_id=1213 Wrote:I think it is time Good Morning Britain had a complete overhaul and revamp and either a regular replacement for Piers or as someone suggested a while back: Susannah at the helm but people feeding off.

I have been off sick the last two weeks and hardly tuned in. At one time it would be on whilst lay in bed.

I fully agree about a revamp. The Big desk needs to go and the political Focus that the show has needs to be toned down a Hell of alot. The debate format needs to be toned down too.

These things worked well during the Piers era but I feel they're trying to replucate that with everyone they've had on since Piers left. I'm guessing that the big focus on debates/ Politics is part of the reason why there's still no replacement for Piers a year on. To me, every guest host that has been on so far has tried to be another Piers.

I think the show really needs to move away from the Piers era stuff ASAP to keep it alive (I.e: Less Debate Focused, Less Politics Focused).
I think they (GMB) actually *have* moved away from the Piers era. It’s only on here that we keep banging-on about it.

Piers’ association with GMB isn’t mentioned elsewhere in the media these days.

That ship has sailed.
<t>I taught them everything......</t>
JamesWorldNews post_id=75061 time= user_id=1044 Wrote:I think they (GMB) actually *have* moved away from the Piers era. It’s only on here that we keep banging-on about it.

Piers’ association with GMB isn’t mentioned elsewhere in the media these days.

That ship has sailed.
I don’t agree I’m afraid. There was a huge array of articles just a few weeks ago marking one year since he flounced out of the studio, for example.

But I suppose his new show- when in starts- will more quickly consign his GMB association to the dustbin
JamesWorldNews post_id=75061 time= user_id=1044 Wrote:I think they (GMB) actually *have* moved away from the Piers era. It’s only on here that we keep banging-on about it.

Piers’ association with GMB isn’t mentioned elsewhere in the media these days.

That ship has sailed.
They haven’t moved away from the Piers format though. You only have to look at every trailer they put out which is always focussed on clips from the daily government minister interview or the deliberately argumentative debates they have on the show. The rest of the show seems to be treat as filler building up to those moments.
Andrew post_id=75066 time= user_id=791 Wrote:
JamesWorldNews post_id=75061 time= user_id=1044 Wrote:I think they (GMB) actually *have* moved away from the Piers era. It’s only on here that we keep banging-on about it.

Piers’ association with GMB isn’t mentioned elsewhere in the media these days.

That ship has sailed.
They haven’t moved away from the Piers format though. You only have to look at every trailer they put out which is always focussed on clips from the daily government minister interview or the deliberately argumentative debates they have on the show. The rest of the show seems to be treat as filler building up to those moments.
Piers didn’t invent that you know. Contrary to what some think he didn’t have full creative control over the show.
HarveyB post_id=75056 time= user_id=1365 Wrote:I fully agree about a revamp. The Big desk needs to go and the political Focus that the show has needs to be toned down a Hell of alot. The debate format needs to be toned down too.
I think the reality is as a society at the moment so called "politics" is much more central to the conversation - a return to a lightweight format built more around the likes of celebrity culture and human interest stories just wouldn't work in the breakfast slot in the way it used too. Sadly we've kind of lost that innocence at the moment.
@Brekkietweets


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Powered by MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme designed by m0ckingbird © 2015-2026.