wonkey_monkey post_id=40733 time= user_id=1364 Wrote:And don't get me started on Doctor Who blu-rays...
Seems to be far too common for blu-rays of 25p and 50i material to be released at 24p or 60i. The issue there is, for some reason, very few TVs and equipment in the US support 25/50Hz output- even though pretty much everything over here supports 60Hz at least (and usually 24p as well), and most Blu-Ray producers seem to have just decided it's easier to produce one master for international distribution rather than different 24p/60i and 50i versions, particularly as most blu-rays tend not to be region coded. And as 24p/60i is pretty much universally supported, but 50i isn't, that's what we end up with far too often.
There's also the rather curious fact that the blu-ray standard doesn't support 25/30p (well, regular Blu-Ray at least, UHD Blu-Ray supports them), and they have to be encoded as 50/60i (not that I think that really makes a significant difference), whereas the HD-DVD standard did support them. Does seem to be a factor on why some 25p material gets slowed down to 24p though, even if it isn't released in a 60Hz territory, seems like a progressive master is preffered even if it is at the wrong frame rate.
Why US versions of equipment often don't support 50Hz seems strange to me. Even going back to the 90s, every TV I've owned with some sort of Aux input will switch to 480i60- admittedly with a couple of exceptions it will only come out in colour with a Scart RGB connection, and only black and white with composite, presumably because it can't decode the NTSC colour, but they still always supported it at least in black and white (even a mid-90s portable we had that only had an RCA composite input), and every DVD player I've owned can output 480i as well. In Europe, TV's won't even get HD Ready certification if they don't support 60Hz (and 24Hz as well for 1080p HD ready). Surely it wouldn't be difficult for manufacturers to include that capability in US models, even if it isn't likely to be used by many.